Last Friday, I went to see my friend play the role of Afi (Ofelia) in Revenge of a King, the hip-hop rendition of Hamlet. Though few similarities exist between Shakespeare’s version and this new-age adaptation other than a somewhat comparable plot, one resounding likeness was the existence of the ghost of Hamlet’s father. Its presence in both versions forced me to begin to question the true significance and purpose of the ghost in Hamlet’s mental decay. After much thought, I reasoned the apparition, only audible to Hamlet himself, exemplifies the inner struggle of good versus evil, his own personal angel and devil on his shoulders, within Hamlet’s mind that leads to his fall into madness.
The d(evil): Throughout the first two acts of Hamlet, the ghost catalyzes the beginning of Hamlet’s descent into madness. By filling Hamlet’s head and heart with thoughts of anger and hatred, mostly directed towards his treacherous uncle Claudius, the ghost sets Hamlet on a one way path of revenge. The ghost of Hamlet’s father guilt trips Hamlet, however unnecessary to fulfill his ultimate goal, in order to further his person ambition of avenging his murder. “If thou dist ever thy dear father love --/Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder.” Not only does the meaning of ghost’s words compromise Hamlet, but the ghost’s diction (unnatural, foul, incestuous, etc.) also worsens the turmoil within Hamlet by playing on already his weak emotions. Though it is a common trend throughout history for a son to carry out his father’s “unfinished business,” in this particular case, it seems as though the ghost plays upon Hamlet’s weak state to fulfill his own goals, without care to how detrimental it may be to Hamlet. In the end, the vengeful instructions of the ghost allow evil to overthrow the once-innate goodness of his mind and permit madness to overcome, as he nears his last breath.
The angel (good): Though the ghost’s inherent evil is easier to argue, the apparition of the dead Hamlet’s soul also serves as a representation of truth and a figure to ease Hamlet’s loneliness in the first two acts of Shakespeare’s famous work. By uncovering the truth of the ex-king’s murder, the ghost provides Hamlet with an explanation to his ever-increasing speculations regarding the rotten state of Denmark. The truth also gives Hamlet a purpose, thus providing him a motive to continue his life on earth. This increased connection with his lost father provides him with not only purpose but also a mental connection, someone to at least partially understand his inner suffering. Though the ghost’s intentions are dishonorable, his presence at least provides Hamlet with a “human” connection, someone who he can reach out to in his time of need. The truth and sense of purpose afforded Hamlet by the ghost save Hamlet, at least for a short period of time, from falling into complete madness.
By Act III, it seems the evil of the devil occupying Hamlet’s mind has defeated the once-inherent good of the noble prince. The ghost’s true purpose is still undecided, however; only time and the rest of the Shakespeare’s play will uncover the truth of the ghost. (528)
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Isabel,
Very interesting conclusion about the ghost representing good and evil! I had never thought of the ghost in this way, but I think that it fits the circumstances of the play very well. You have convinced me that the ghost does have a broader implication to the story than just being the apparition of Hamlet’s dead father. Really a great blog!
Izzy,
Nice interpretation of the ghost representing good and evil--I definitely never would have thought of that. I like how you gave supporting evidence for both ghost representing both good and evil/angel and demon. I also agree that the ghost's true purpose is not completely known just yet. Nice work!
Isabel a very good and interesting blog. I am intrigued by your thoughts that the ghost is both good and bad. I was a little skeptical of your point at first but by the end of your blog you had swayed me. Well done, and great job in finding a really interesting idea and defending it well
Great Job! It really struck me that the ghost could be viewed as evil and as though he was guilt tripping Hamlet into killing the uncle for his own personal gain. I would have to put the ghost more on the good side. I feel like he could possibly be helping Hamlet with his desire to live. Your blog was really well done!
Isabel :-)
What an interesting blog! Thank you for this enlightening comparison of good versus evil in this complicated play. You definitely made me think about the role of the ghost! (And that other play sounds really cool.)
<3
Sophie
Isabel, I really enjoyed reading your blog. Your point about the confusing and mysterious nature about the ghost as possibly being good and evil was unique and you backed up your argument very well. I definitely think of the ghost as a more important character after reading your blog. Nice job!
Isabel,
I really liked your conclusion concerning the ambivalence of the ghost. Plus, I think it was cool that you got to see that play. Great job. Bye.
Harry
Hey Is!
I really like how you really delved into the topic of the ghost. You def brought up some cool ideas about good and evil that I have not thought of before. I think your argument/thesis goes to show that people, ghosts, spirits, etc cannot be seen in just black and white. Great Job!
Hip hop version sounds cool too :)
IzzFrizz--very nice consideration of the pros and cons of the ghost. Once again you show your ability to think through both sides of a problem.
And I agree that the ghost is an ambiguous figure. Especially since Hamlet is (even though Horatio sees the ghost) the only one who ever hears the ghost speak. Good job.
Post a Comment